Cutline or: How I Learned to Stop Pivoting and Love the Slop or: Why I Built a Product Cofounder

As a solo developer or small team, you don't have the luxury of a full product team. You need to make good decisions quickly. You need to identify icebergs before they’ve emerged. You need someone to challenge your assumptions. That's what Cutline is: **a product coach that helps you make better product decisions**. It started as ChatGPT prompts. It evolved into a full product powered by Gemini.

Why I Built a Product Cofounder

As you know, I’ve been deep in the trenches building TextGuardian—a personal antiscam coach available over SMS. The core concept seems simple at first glance: users forward suspicious texts, and TextGuardian analyzes them to determine if they're scams.

It sounds straightforward. It hasn't been.

I’ve been busy relearning a lesson I’ve encountered many times in my Trust & Safety AI/ML career: people love Safety as a concept but struggle to evaluate and price it as a good. We Security professionals know that while what we offer is relative risk reduction, most buyers want an absolute cure-all. Couple that with some other challenges in the space: going to market with an SMS app, selling primarily to seniors, selling AI to consumers; and I knew I had to uplevel my product and GTM game fast.

So I turned to the Magic 8-Ball of these times: I asked ChatGPT what to do. In lieu of a product co-founder, I went deep with ChatGPT in many, many conversations, with such prompts as "Act as a skeptical product manager. Review this product idea and identify the top 5 risks that could kill it." and "What are the key assumptions we need to validate before building this feature?"

These prompts got the job done, but they were fragmented and inconsistent. Each conversation was isolated. I'd lose context between sessions. The outputs weren't structured in a way that made them actionable. And worse yet, it was optimistic to the point of being naive.

“You’re Absolutely Right!!!” probably boosts morale when you’re in the trenches (I suspect that phrase is in post-training data for the express purpose of keeping developers burning tokens longer) but it’s a rotten tenet for product vision. In the age of vibecoding, velocity has never been greater, but the direction of our vector has maybe never been more aimless. Where is the Cambrian explosion of production apps we’ve all been vibecoding? I suspect the vast majority of them are getting desk-drawered between the prototype and production stage, partially due to productionalization challenges but probably more due to GTM & product realities.
I needed special purpose AI that was more systematic, but above all, candid. Something that could:

  • Maintain context across multiple product decisions
  • Structure outputs in a consistent, actionable format
  • Integrate with my workflow (not just a chat interface)
  • Learn from previous analyses

Cutline : An AI Product Manager that Says No

That's when I decided to build my product cofounder CandidAI—what would eventually become Cutline.

I migrated from ChatGPT to Gemini for a few reasons:

  1. Familiarity: I’ve already built TextGuardian in Firebase and Gemini and at this point I am very familiar with the stack.
  2. Customizabaility: Vertex AI features for customizing models came in very handy for segueing from ‘Absolutely Right! AI’ to Candid AI.
  3. Cost efficiency: For the volume of analysis I needed, Gemini was more cost-effective.

I built the backend on Firebase because:

  • Real-time updates: I could see analysis results as they were generated
  • Persistence: All my product analyses were stored and searchable
  • Scalability: Firebase handles the infrastructure so I can focus on the product logic
  • Authentication: Built-in auth for sharing analyses easily

What CandidAI Became

What started as a set of prompts became a full product management suite:

  • Pre-mortem analysis: Systematic risk identification across demand, channel, unit economics, operations, legal, and competition
  • Assumption tracking: Explicit assumptions with validation plans and deadlines
  • Market analysis: TAM/SAM/SOM calculations with rationale
  • Decision framework: Go/No-Go recommendations with quantified confidence levels -Feature prioritization: Automatic MoSCoW type analysis based on conjoint analysis ion specifically how that feature will help you convert, retain, or price

And an exciting feature coming soon: Cutline User Personas — what if we took a user story and used AI to make it interactive? A Cutline Persona is anchored to a specific set of desires, viewpoints, and behaviors to provide live feedback on products and features.

Most importantly, CutlineAI is pessimistic by default. While most AI tools are overly optimistic cheerleaders, Cutline is designed to help you "murder your darlings" before you invest too much time and money.

I’ve been having a bit of fun having Cutline evaluate joke companies (Aplets&Cotlets.com is my idea for a subscription box that will ship Aplets & Cotlets anywhere in the world or on the ISS for $1 a month) and busted startups of the past (Juicero was a company that tried to apply DRM for some reason to cold-pressed juice).

The TextGuardian Lesson

Cutline was, shall we say, ‘quick to the cut’ with TextGuardian — Cutline's pre-mortem analysis was sobering. The system identified risks I'd been aware of but hadn't fully quantified:

  • User behavior friction (users not forwarding messages)
  • Platform risk from telco blocking (I’ve encountered this and have some work arounds but it’s outright killed some features that could have added value)
  • Unsustainable unit economics due to high/unknown CAC

The analysis recommended No-Go with specific kill criteria. It wasn't what I wanted to hear, but it was what I needed to hear.

This isn’t a full pivot of TextGuardian, but a ‘pause and ponder’: at present, I think TextGuardian might be too early in the 2025 market (especially for a solopreneur with little consumer experience like myself) and might be ripe with some tweaks and developments for 2027 or 2028. For now, TextGuardian remains a going concern and the software will be in Keeping The Lights On Mode, while in the meantime I am focusing on building tools like Cutline that will enable solopreneurs, startups, and engineering teams to build the next wave of applications.

Why This Matters

As a solo developer or small team, you don't have the luxury of a full product team. You need to make good decisions quickly. You need to identify icebergs before they’ve emerged. You need someone to challenge your assumptions.

That's what Cutline is: a product coach that helps you make better product decisions.

It started as ChatGPT prompts. It evolved into a full product powered by Gemini and Firebase. And it's saved me from building products and features that would have been dead on arrival.

If you need a new approach to product development for the AI age, go to thecutline.ai/premium and enroll as one of the first members of our heavily discounted Founder Member cohort ($9.99 monthly/$99 annual).


Read more about

·4 min read·changelog

Cutline now helps you before you have an idea to stress-test. Exploration Mode is a free, AI-guided ideation flow that takes you from vague domain curiosity to concrete, value-ranked product ideas—then seamlessly graduates your best idea into a full pre-mortem analysis.

·3 min read·Changelog

Persona creation as a marketing/product exercise has it uses for refining product thinking, but it’s generally left at the ideation stage and isn’t brought forward as any part of success criteria. Testing, on the other hand, does play a part in acceptance criteria, but it generally dwells in the abstract—it’s “triple distilled” from specific customer desire, laundered through organizations that by virtue of their siloing don’t colocate customer success with test definition. I think AI is going to desilo organizations or their would-be replacements quicker than we think, and so I think it’s time to ask the question: what if we could design personas that could actually tell us what they thought of our product? Literally, give them a test account and ask them for their thoughts?

·5 min read·changelog

If the Twentieth Century was the Taylorist Century, the AI Century will be the Context Century. If before, product risk lurked in the execution of individual tasks, in the Age of AI, it lurks in hidden global context.. The PMs of the AI era, whether human or AI, will be decreasingly assigning work, and increasingly finding and supplying context.